Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 16 Jul 2010

Epistemic Boomerang: Expert Policy Advice As Leverage in the Campaign Against Transgenic Maize in Mexico

Page Range: 179 – 198
DOI: 10.17813/maiq.15.2.a568g55h0k663k30
Save
Download PDF

This article introduces the term "epistemic boomerang" to describe a distinctive pattern of activism in which activists, frustrated by exclusion from national politics, attempt to mobilize expert advice in support of social goals. Using expertise as leverage can be a desirable option for activists when political authorities favor technocratic decision making. Epistemic boomerang formation is possible when expert organizations encourage citizen participation in agenda setting and spaces are made for encounters between experts and activists. These processes are evident in the contentious politics of genetically engineered maize in Mexico. In this case, maize producers and community activists mobilized to confront an expert advisory group assembled by the tri-national Commission for Environmental Cooperation. As a result, the values and perspectives of many of the protesters were conveyed in the expert report and recommendations. This article examines the political outcomes of this epistemic boomerang and considers its implications for the study of social movements.

Andree, Peter, and Lucy Sharratt. 2004. Is the Canadian Government Implementing the Royal Society of Canada's Recommendations? Ottawa: The Polaris Institute.

Antal, Edit. 2006. "Lessons from NAFTA: The Role of the North American Commission for Environmental Cooperation in Conciliating Trade and Environment." Michigan State Journal of International Law 14: 167-189.

Armstrong, Elizabeth A., and Mary Bernstein. 2008. "Culture, Power, and Institutions: A Multi-Institutional Politics Approach to Social Movements." Sociological Theory 26(1): 74-99.

Benford, Robert D., and David A. Snow. 2000. "Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment." Annual Review of Sociology 26: 611-39.

Benveniste, Guy. 1973. The Politics of Expertise. London: Croom Helm, Ltd.

Boutwell, Jeffrey. 2002. "The Impact of Agricultural Biotechnology on Environmental and Food Security." Retrieved June 28, 2007 http://www.pugwash.org/reports/ees/mcity.htm

Brookey, Robert Alan. 2002. Reinventing the Male Homosexual: The Rhetoric and Power of the Gay Gene. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Brown, Phil. 1992. "Popular Epidemiology and Toxic Waste Contamination: Lay and Professional Ways of Knowing." Journal of Health and Social Behavior 33(3): 267-81.

Brown, Phil, and Edwin J. Mikkelsen. 1990. No Safe Place: Toxic Waste, Leukemia, and Community Action. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Brush, Stephen, and Michelle Chauvet. 2004. "Chapter 6: Assessment of Social and Cultural Effects Associated with Transgenic Maize Production." Background paper prepared for the Article 13 Initiative on Maize and Biodiversity, Secretariat of the Commission for Environmental Cooperation of North America. Retrieved August 21, 2009. http://www.cec.org/files/PDF//Maize-Biodiversity-Chapter6_en.pdf

Capek, Stella M. 2000. "Reframing Endometriosis: From 'Career Woman's Disease' to Environment/Body Connections." Pp. 345-63 in Illness and the Environment: A Reader in Contested Medicine, edited by Steve Kroll-Smith, Phil Brown and Valerie J. Gunter. New York: New York University Press.

Carruthers, David V. 1996. "Indigenous Ecology and the Politics of Linkage in Mexican Social Movements." Third World Quarterly 17(5): 1007-28.

CIBIOGEM [Comisión Intersecretarial de Bioseguridad de los Organismos Genéticamente Modificados]. 2004. "Comments by CIBIOGEM Technical Committee." Attachment to Maize and Biodiversity: The Effects of Transgenic Maize in Mexico. Montreal: Communications Department of the Secretariat of the Commission for Environmental Cooperation.

Cooke, Bill, and Uma Kothari (eds). 2001. Participation: The New Tyranny? New York: Zed Books.

Corburn, Jason. 2005. Street Science: Community Knowledge and Environmental Health Justice. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Delborne, Jason. 2005. "Pathways of Scientific Dissent in Agricultural Biotechnology." Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management.

Drori, Gili S., and John W. Meyer. 2006. "Global Scientization: An Environment for Expanded Organization." Pp. 50-68 in Globalization and Organization: World Society and Organizational Change, edited by Gili S. Drori, John W. Meyer, and Hokyu Hwang. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Drori, Gili S., John W. Meyer, Francisco O. Ramirez, and Evan Schofer. 2003. Science in the Modern World Polity: Institutionalization and Globalization. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Dunlap, Riley E., and Angela G. Mertig. 1992. "The Evolution of the U.S. Environmental Movement from 1970-1990: An Overview." Society and Natural Resources 4: 209-18.

Environment Canada. 2004. "Comments of Canada." Attachment to Maize and Biodiversity: The Effects of Transgenic Maize in Mexico. Montreal: Communications Department of the Secretariat of the Commission for Environmental Cooperation.

Epstein, Steven. 1996. Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Espeland, Wendy Nelson. 1998. The Struggle for Water: Politics, Rationality, and Identity in the American Southwest. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

ETC Group. 2003. Open letter from international civil society organizations on transgenic contamination in the centers of origin and diversity to the Mexican government and the international community. November 19. Retrieved June 24, 2007( http:www.etcgroup.orgenmaterialspublications.html>

Expert Panel of the Royal Society of Canada. 2001. Elements of Precaution: Recommendations for the Regulation of Food Biotechnology in Canada. Ottawa: Royal Society of Canada.

Eyerman, Ron, and Andrew Jamison. 1991. Social Movements: A Cognitive Approach. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.

Frickel, Scott. 2004a. "Building an Interdiscipline: Collective Action Framing and the Rise of Genetic Toxicology." Social Problems 51(2): 269-87.

Frickel, Scott. 2004b. Chemical Consequences: Environmental Mutagens, Scientist Activism and the Rise of Genetic Toxicology. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

Gieryn, Thomas F. 1999. Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Goldman, Michael. 2004. "Imperial Science, Imperial Nature: Environmental Knowledge for the World (Bank)." Pp. 55-80 in Earthly Politics: Local and Global in Environmental Governance, edited by Sheila Jasanoff and Marybeth Long Martello. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Gough, Claire, and Simon Shackley. 2001. "The Respectable Politics of Climate Change: The Epistemic Communities and NGOs." International Affairs 77(2): 329-345.

Greenpeace México, Grupo de Estudios Ambientales, and UNORCA. 2004. Boletín 0419: Avalan Comunidades Oaxaqueñas y ONG la Recomendación del Comité Público de la CCA sobre la Contaminación del Maíz. Mexico City.

Haas, Peter M. 1992. "Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination." International Organization 46(1): 1-35.

Habermas, Jurgen. 1970. Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science, and Politics. Boston: Beacon Press.

Hays, Samuel P. 1987. Beauty, Health, and Permanence: Environmental Politics in the United States, 1955-1985. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Henriques, Gisele, and Raj Patel. 2003. "Policy Brief No. 7: Agricultural Trade Liberalization and Mexico." Oakland, CA: Food First/Institute for Food and Development Policy.

Henriques, Gisele, and Raj Patel. 2004. "NAFTA, Corn, and Mexico's Agricultural Trade Liberalization." Oakland, CA: Food First/Institute for Food and Development Policy.

Hess, David J. 2007. Alternative Pathways in Science and Technology: Activism, Innovation, and the Environment in an Era of Globalization. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Hess, David J.. 2009. "The Potentials and Limitations of Civil Society Research: Getting Undone Science Done." Sociological Inquiry 79(3): 306-27.

Hess, David, Steve Breyman, Nancy Campbell, and Brian Martin. 2008. "Science, Technology, and Social Movements." Pp. 473-98 in The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3rd edition, edited by Edward J. Hackett, Olga Amsterdamska, Michael Lynch, and Judy Wajcman. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Jackson, John P., Jr. 2001. Social Scientists for Social Justice: Making the Case against Segregation. New York: New York University Press.

Jamison, Andrew. 2006. "Social Movements and Science: Cultural Appropriations of Cognitive Praxis." Science as Culture 15(1): 45-59.

Jasanoff, Sheila S. 1987. "Contested Boundaries in Policy-Relevant Science." Social Studies of Science 17: 195-230.

Jasanoff, Sheila S.. 1990. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Jenkins, J. Craig, and Charles Perrow. 1977. "Insurgency of the Powerless: Farm Worker Movements (1946-1972)." American Sociological Review 42: 249-68.

Joint Public Advisory Committee. 2004. "RE: Maize and biodiversity symposium of the Commission for Environmental Cooperation." April 13. Retrieved June 28, 2007 http://www.cec.org/files/pdf/JPAC/JPAC-Letter-Maize-13-Apr-04_en.pdf

Keck, Margaret E., and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Khagram, Sanjeev, James V. Riker, and Kathryn Sikkink. 2002. "From Santiago to Seattle: Transnational Advocacy Groups Restructuring World Politics." Pp. 3-23 in Restructuring World Politics: Transnational Social Movements, Networks, and Norms, edited by Sanjeev Khagram, James V. Riker, and Kathryn Sikkink. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Kinchy, Abby J. 2006. "On the Borders of Post-War Ecology: Struggles over the Ecological Society of America's Preservation Committee, 1917-1946." Science as Culture 15(1): 23-44.

Kinchy, Abby J., and Daniel Lee Kleinman. 2003. "Organizing Credibility: Discursive and Organizational Orthodoxy on the Borders of Ecology and Politics." Social Studies of Science 33(6): 869-96.

Kinchy, Abby J., Daniel Lee Kleinman, and Robyn Autry. 2008. "Against Free Markets, Against Science? Regulating the Socioeconomic Effects of Biotechnology." Rural Sociology 73: 147-179.

Kleinman, Daniel Lee, Abby J. Kinchy, and Robyn Autry. 2009. "Local Variation or Global Convergence in Agricultural Biotechnology Policy? A Comparative Analysis." Science and Public Policy 36(5): 361-71.

Lamont, Michele, and Virag Molnar. 2002. "The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences." Annual Review of Sociology 28: 167-195.

Massieu Trigo, Yolanda Cristina, and Adelita San Vicente Tello. 2006. "El Proceso de Aprobación de la Ley de Bioseguridad: Política a la Mexicana e Interés Nacional." El Cotidiano 21(136): 39-51.

McAdam, Doug. 1982. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930-1970. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

McCarthy, John D., and Mayer N. Zald. 1977. "Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory." American Journal of Sociology 82: 1212-41.

McCormick, Sabrina. 2006. "The Brazilian Anti-Dam Movement: Knowledge Contestation as Communicative Action." Organization & Environment 19(3): 321-46.

McCormick, Sabrina. 2007. "Democratizing Science Movements: A New Framework for Mobilization and Contestation." Social Studies of Science 37(4): 609-23.

McCormick, Sabrina, Phil Brown, and Stephen Zavestoski. 2003. "The Personal is Scientific, the Scientific is Political: The Public Paradigm of the Environmental Breast Cancer Movement." Sociological Forum 18(4): 545-76.

Mitman, Gregg. 1992. The State of Nature: Ecology, Community and American Social Thought, 1900-1950. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Moore, Kelly. 1996. "Organizing Integrity: American Science and the Creation of Public Interest Organizations, 1955-1975." American Journal of Sociology 101(6): 1592-1627.

Moore, Kelly. 2008. Disrupting Science: Social Movements, American Scientists, and the Politics of the Military, 1945-1975. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Morello-Frosch, Rachel, Stephen Zavestoski, Phil Brown, Rebecca Gasior Altman, Sabrina McCormick, and Brian Mayer. 2006. "Embodied Health Movements: Responses to a Scientized World." Pp. 244-271 in The New Political Sociology of Science: Institutions, Networks, and Power, edited by Scott Frickel and Kelly Moore. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Nadal, Alejandro. 2000. Mexican Corn: Genetic Variability and Trade Liberalization. Mexico City: El Colegio de Mexico.

Nadal, Alejandro. 2003. "Corn in NAFTA Eight Years After: Effects on Mexican Biodiversity." Pp. 152-172 in Greening NAFTA: The North American Commission for Environmental Cooperation, edited by David L. Markell and John H. Knox. Stanford, CA: Stanford Law and Politics, Stanford University Press.

Piven, Frances Fox, and Richard Cloward. 1978. Poor People's Movements: Why They Succeed, How They Fail. New York: Vintage.

Price, Don K. 1965. The Scientific Estate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Quist, David, and Ignacio H. Chapela. 2001. "Transgenic DNA Introgressed into Traditional Maize Landraces in Oaxaca, Mexico." Nature 414(6863): 541-43.

Red "En Defensa del Maíz." 2005. "Nuevas Evidencias de Contaminación Transgénica del Maíz Campesino." Press Release.

Redlin, David. 2003. "Rationale for U.S. Changes to the Terms of Reference." Retrieved June 28, 2007 http://www.cec.org/pubs_docs/documents/index.cfm?varlan=English&ID=1160

Respondent 3. 2006. Recorded interview with author, Oaxaca, México, March 6.

Respondent 5. 2005. Recorded telephone interview with author, Madison, WI, November 23.

Respondent 8. 2005. Recorded interview with author, México, D.F., November 11.

Respondent 41. 2005. Recorded interview with author, México, D.F., November 14.

Respondent 58. 2007. Unrecorded telephone interview with author, Madison, WI, May 30.

Rochon, Thomas R. 1998. Culture Moves: Ideas, Activism, and Changing Values. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Sarewitz, Daniel 2004. "How Science Makes Environmental Controversies Worse." Environmental Science & Policy 7(5): 385-403.

Schnaiberg, Allan. 1980. The Environment: From Surplus to Scarcity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Secretariat of the Commission for Environmental Cooperation. 2004. Maize & Biodiversity: The Effects of Transgenic Maize in Mexico. Montreal: Communications Department of the Secretariat of the Commission for Environmental Cooperation.

Seidman, Gay W. 2007. Beyond the Boycott: Labor Rights, Human Rights and Transnational Activism. New York: American Sociological Association's Rose Series/Russell Sage Foundation Press.

Snow, David, and Robert Benford. 1988. "Ideology, Frame Resonance, and Participant Mobilization." International Social Movement Research 1: 197-217.

Tarrow, Sidney. 2005. The New Transnational Activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tesh, Sylvia Noble. 2000. Uncertain Hazards: Environmental Activists and Scientific Proof. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

US Environmental Protection Agency. 2004. "Comments of the United States." Attachment to Maize and Biodiversity: The Effects of Transgenic Maize in Mexico. Montreal: Communications Department of the Secretariat of the Commission for Environmental Cooperation.

Vera Herrera, Ramón. 2004. "In Defense of Maize (And the Future)." Retrieved June 3, 2007 http://americas.irc-online.org/pdf/series/13.maiz.pdf

Wirth, John D. 2003. "Perspectives on the Joint Public Advisory Committee." Pp. 199-216 in Greening NAFTA: The North American Commission for Environmental Cooperation, edited by David L. Markell and John H. Knox. Stanford, CA: Stanford Law and Politics, Stanford University Press.

Yearley, Steven. 1992. "Green Ambivalence about Science: Legal-Rational Authority and the Scientific Legitimation of a Social Movement." The British Journal of Sociology 43(4): 511-32.

  • Download PDF