Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 01 Dec 2015

Rightful Radical Resistance: Mass Mobilization and Land Struggles in India and Brazil*

Page Range: 493 – 515
DOI: 10.17813/1086-671X-20-4-493
Save
Download PDF

An examination of mass mobilizations to promote land rights of the landless and near-landless by Ekta Parishad in India and the Landless Rural Workers Movement (MST) in Brazil identifies a similar strategy of rightful radical resistance that incorporates key elements of rightful resistance but also transcends it. The comparable strategy is due to similarities in context: India and Brazil are semiperipheral countries with relatively high-capacity states and representative democratic political structures, but have inequitable distributions of agricultural land despite constitutional principles and laws that embody equitable land distributions. However, given the substantial variation across India and Brazil in culture, geography, and demography, the specific forms assumed by rightful radical resistance vary. This study contributes to the social movements and civil resistance literatures by explicating the strategic logic of the mass mobilizations, explaining similarities and differences across the two cases, and illustrating the potential of civil resistance for challenging the structural violence of land dispossession and inequality.

Copyright: © 2015 Hank Johnston DBA Mobilization Journal 2015

Contributor Notes

* Thanks to Maciej Bartkowski, Jill Carr-Harris, Sean Mitchell, Sharon Erickson Nepstad and Mobilization reviewers for insightful comments. Early versions of the paper were presented at the meetings of the International Studies Association in Montreal, Canada in 2011 and International Peace Research Association in Tsu City, Japan in 2012. Thanks to participants in those sessions as well. This research was partially funded by a grant from the United States Institute for Peace. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the view of the United States Institute for Peace.

Kurt Schock is Associate Professor of Sociology and Director of the International Institute for Peace at Rutgers University, Newark. Please direct all correspondence to Kurt Schock at kschock@andromeda.rutgers.edu.

  • Download PDF