Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 01 Dec 2018

LEGITIMATION BATTLES, BACKFIRE DYNAMICS, AND TACTICAL PERSISTENCE IN THE NFL ANTHEM PROTESTS, 2016–2017*

and
Page Range: 469 – 483
DOI: 10.17813/1086-671X-23-4-469
Save
Download PDF

We examine the 2016–2017 National Football League (NFL) kneeling protests that were performed during the pregame national anthem to draw attention to the problems of police brutality and violence against African Americans. Elaborating the concept of tactical neutralization, we delineate various strategies that opponents used to delegitimize this tactic and strip it of its power, thereby encouraging the athlete-protesters to desist. Drawing on online newspaper accounts of the NFL anthem protests, we use directed content analysis methods to inductively discern these “neutralization strategies,” which included discursive delegitimation of the protesters and their tactics, imposing costs for participation, and cooptation. Through successful relegitimation efforts, these athlete-protesters were able to sustain their tactic, even in the face of widespread opposition. Furthermore, a backfire dynamic was unleashed when a controversial, high profile opponent engaged in these delegitimation efforts, resulting in increased participation and heightened tactical strength.

Copyright: © 2018 Mobilization: An International Quarterly 2018

Contributor Notes

* Sharon Erickson Nepstad is Distinguished Professor of Sociology and Alexis M. Kenney is a doctoral candidate in the Department of Sociology at the University of New Mexico. Please direct all correspondence to nepstad@unm.edu.

We thank our colleagues at the University of New Mexico, particularly Kristin Barker, for helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper. We also thank three anonymous reviewers, Scott M. MacLennan, and Kenneth Andrews for insightful suggestions and valuable feedback.

  • Download PDF