Decolonizing Civil Resistance*
Western scholars dominating the field generally suggest that civil resistance struggles involve public contention with unjust states to expand political rights and civil liberties. We argue that this perspective is an example of Eurocentric universalism, which has three blind spots: it tends to ignore struggles seeking to subvert rather than join the liberal world system, as well as coloniality's effects on nonviolent action, and emerging subjugated knowledges. We propose going beyond these limitations by learning from social movements focusing on human dignity, material self-sufficiency, and local autonomy, especially in the Global South. Our essay examines two classic decolonizing thinkers (Gandhi and Fanon) and two contemporary decolonizing struggles (the Zapatistas in Mexico and the Abahlali in South Africa). Each emphasizes coloniality, constructive over contentious resistance, transformations in political subjectivity, and emancipatory visions that go beyond Western ideals. We call for further research on the many different stories of civil resistance across the worldwide coloniality line.
Contributor Notes
* We thank the anonymous reviewers, the writing group at School of Global Studies, the Nordic Nonviolence Study Seminar (Nornos) and Sharon Erickson Nepstad for valuable comments.
† Sean Chabot is Professor in the Department of Sociology at Eastern Washington University. Stellan Vinthagen is Endowed Chair in the Study of Nonviolent Direct Action and Civil Resistance and Professor of sociology at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. Please direct all correspondence to Sean Chabot at schabot@ewu.edu.