THE REBEL ALLIANCE STRIKES BACK: UNDERSTANDING THE POLITICS OF BACKLASH MOBILIZATION*
How does repression influence backlash (i.e., challenges against political authorities that follow acts of government coercion)? This study argues that to adequately study backlash, it is necessary to analytically open up a social movement and examine why specific individuals in the same movement organization increase their participation following repression while other members drop out. The study uses original panel data on organizational behavior and individual participation in a black-nationalist insurgency group called the Republic of New Africa. Results show that the effects of repression are more complex than previously imagined. At the organizational level, repression leads to backlash challenges. At the individual level, however, repression has mixed effects. Challengers who personally experience repression become more likely to participate in post-repression challenging activities. At the same time, those within the organization who did not directly experience repression withdraw.
Contributor Notes
* This article benefited greatly from comments by Kraig Beyelein, Rory McVeigh, participants at CUNY's Protest and Politics Workshop and at Notre Dame's Social Movements and Politics Seminar, four anonymous reviewers, and the editor at Mobilization. See http://www.sullivanchristophermichael.com for supplemental material and replication data are available.
† Christopher Michael Sullivan is Assistant Professor of Political Science at Louisiana State University. Christian Davenport is Professor of Political Science and Faculty Associate with the Center for Political Studies at the University of Michigan as well as Research Professor at the Peace Research Institute of Oslo (PRIO).