Editorial Type:
Article Category: Research Article
 | 
Online Publication Date: 21 Feb 2006

Event Analysis of Claim Making in Mexico: How are Social Protests Transformed into Political Protests?

Page Range: 241 – 257
DOI: 10.17813/maiq.9.3.7wx2pt66130718v3
Save
Download PDF

Why do citizens demand certain kinds of citizenship rights rather than another in a given context? This article extends the idea of political and cultural opportunities to Mexico's authoritarian context to explore why Mexicans, who had prioritized social rights over other rights, came to emphasize political rights in a context of neoliberalism. In particular, I ask how this transformation from social protests to political protests happened when neither political nor cultural opportunities appeared to be conducive to it? I gathered 1174 episodes of popular protests between 1964 and 2000 from Mexican newspapers and employed a quantitative event analysis to examine discursive aspects of claims making. In the neoliberal period, demands for social rights and material issues were made increasingly in conjunction with demands for political rights. Mexicans came to realize that their everyday needs and redistributive demands would not be satisfied without dealing with undemocratic political system. It is this change in people's recognition that pushed political claims making to the forefront of popular contention in Mexico.

Foweraker, Joe and Todd Landman. 1997. Citizenship Rights and Social Movements: A Comparative and Statistical Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Franzosi, Roberto. 1998. "Narrative Analysis—or Why (and How) Sociologists Should Be Interested in Narrative." Annual Review of Sociology 24: 517-554.

Snow, David A., E. Burke Rochford, Steven K. Worden, and Robert D. Benford. 1986. "Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation." American Sociological Review 51(4): 464-481.

Snow, David and Robert D. Benford. 1988. "Ideology, Frame Resonance, and Participant Mobilization." Pp. 133-155 in From Structure to Action: Comparing Social Movement Research across Cultures, Bert Klandermans and Sidney Tarrow eds. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Tamayo Flores-Alatorre, Sergio. 1999. Los Veinte Octubres Mexicanos: la Transition a la Modernizatión y la Democracia, 1968-1988. México, D.F.: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Azcapotzalco.

Tarrow, Sidney. 1989. Democracy and Disorder: Politics and Protest in Italy, 1965-1975. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tilly, Charles. 1995. Popular Contention in Great Britain, 1758-1834. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Tilly, Charles. 2003. Contention and Democracy in Europe, 1650-2000. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

Wasserman, Stanley and Katherine Faust. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Method and Applications. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Shapiro, Gilbert, and John Markoff. 1998. Revolutionary Demands: A Content Analysis of the Cahiers De Doleances of 1789. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Lustig, Nora. 1992. Mexico, the Remaking of an Economy. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.

Sarmiento, Sergio. 1997. "Trial by Fire: The Chiapas Revolt, the Colosio Assassination and the Mexican Press in 1994," in A Culture of Collusion: An Inside Look at the Mexican Press, William A. Orme, Jr. ed. Miami: North-South Center Press, University of Miami.

Snow, David A., and Robert D. Benford. 1992. "Master Frames and Cycles of Protest," in Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, Aldon D. Morris and Carol McClurg Mueller eds. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Diani, Mario. 1996. "Linking Mobilization Frames and Political Opportunities: Insights from Regional Populism in Italy. "American Sociological Review 61(6): 1053-1069.

Donati, Paolo R. 1992. "Political Discourse Analysis," in Studying Collective Action, Marco Diani and Ron Eyerman eds. London: Sage.

McAdam, Doug, John D. McCarthy, and Mayer N. Zald, eds. 1996. Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

McAdam, Doug, Sidney G. Tarrow, and Charles Tilly. 2001. Dynamics of Contention. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Kielbowicz, Richard B., and Clifford Scherer. 1986. "The Role of the Press in the Dynamics of Social Movements." Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change 9: 71-96.

Koopmans, Ruud and Paul Statham. 1999. "Political Claims Analysis: Integrating Protest Event and Political Discourse Approaches." Mobilization 4(1): 40-51.

Kriesi, Hanspeter, Ruud Koopmans, Jan Willem Duyvendak, and Marco G. Giugni. 1995. New Social Movements in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Lawson, Joseph Chappell H. 2002. Building the Fourth Estate: Democratization and the Rise of a Free Press in Mexico. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Franzosi, Roberto.2004. From Words to Numbers: Narrative, Data, and Social Science. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

Gamson, William A. 1992. Talking Politics. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

Johnston, Hank and Bert Klandermans, eds. 1995. Social Movements and Culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Goodwin, Jeff and James M. Jasper. 1999. "Caught in a Winding, Snarling Vine: The Structural Bias of Political Process Theory." Sociological Forum 14(1): 27-55.

Johnston, Hank. 2002. "Verification and Proof in Frame and Discourse Analysis. Pp. 62-91 in Methods of Social Movement Research, Bert Klandermans and Suzanne Staggenborg eds. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

McCarthy, John D., Clark McPhail, Jackie Smith, and Luis J. Crishock. 1998. "Electronic and Print Media Representations of Washington, D.C. Demonstrations, 1982 and 1991: A Demography of Description Bias," in Acts of Dissent: New Developments in the Study of Protest, Dieter Rucht, Ruud Koopmans, and Friedhelm Neidhardt eds. Berlin: Edition Sigma.

Molotch, Harvey. 1979. "Media and Movements," in The Dynamics of Social Movements, Mayer N. Zald and John D. McCarthy eds. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.

Morris, Aldon D. and Carol McClurg Mueller, eds. 1992. Frontiers in Social Movement Theory. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Noonan, Rita K. 1995. "Women Against the State: Political Opportunities and Collective Action Frames in Chile's Transition to Democracy." Sociological Forum 10(1): 81-111.

Orme, William A., Jr., eds. 1997. A Culture of Collusion: An inside Look at the Mexican Press. Miami: North-South Center Press.

Sampedro, Victor. 1997. "The Media Politics of Social Protest." Mobilization 2(2): 185-205.

Oberschall, Anthony. 1996. "Opportunities and Framing in the Eastern European Revolts of 1989." Pp. 93-121 in Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, Doug McAdam, John D. McCarthy, and Mayer N. Zald eds. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Oliver, Pamela E. and Daniel J. Myers. 1999. "How Events Enter the Public Sphere: Conflict, Location, and Sponsorship in Local Newspaper Coverage of Public Events." American Journal of Sociology 105(1): 38-87.

  • Download PDF